A - I’ll always want you
B - Because my heart is true
C - Come, come, come closer
And I’ll tell you of the ABCs
— Frankie Lymon and the Teenagers
I’ve been glued to Dr. Frank Luntz’s 2007 book, “Words That Work.” I liked it so much that I bought copies for everyone in my office.
Luntz is a political consultant best known for creating The Contract with America. He gave a number of fascinating ideas on how business and political leaders can best get their point across.
As far as communications books, I rank it up there with Roger Ailes’ book, “You Are the Message” and Peggy Noonan’s, “Speaking Well.”
All three are Republicans. Until Barack Obama came along, Republicans seemed to have cornered the market on people who pay attention to phrasing.
Al Franken said it best.
“Language is like music,” he said. “Unfortunately, the Republicans have a Paul McCartney in the person of Frank Luntz. Somehow, the Democrats got stuck with Yoko Ono.”
Luntz’s had a chapter on a word manipulation that has bothered me for some time, how gambling suddenly became “gaming.”
The turn of the phrase was coined by a former Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Frank Fahrenkopf. After leaving the RNC, Fahrenkopf became president of the American Gaming Association.
To me, gaming means stuff like cricket, croquet and polo. High-browed games that aren’t played for money.
Fahrenkopf was paid by people who own casinos, slot machines and places where people can lose piles of cash.
I doubt any polo players contributed to Frank’s salary.
Frank’s organization did an incredible job of getting the word “gaming” into the vocabulary.
For a long time, you could tell who was for or against the expansion of casinos by the word they used. People who wanted casinos in a state said “gaming,” and opponents called it “gambling.”
Now even natural opponents of gambling, like Baptist ministers, will say they are opposed to “expanded gaming.”
I guess some people just don’t like cricket and croquet.
I always call it gambling because I grew up around gamblers.
I watched people win and lose vast sums of money. I’ve seen people lose their houses — and sometimes their lives — over gambling debts.
You don’t see that happening over on the cricket field.
I’m not opposed gambling in moderation. I’m just opposed to gambling being called gaming.
Luntz took part in a word manipulation that I hate. Calling the estate tax, a “death tax.”
That one worked really well for awhile, but none of the proponents ever got past the obvious. You don’t get taxed to die. Dying is a freebie.
Your family gets taxed when you leave a large estate. As Luntz points out, you really only get taxed when you leave a large estate and don’t hire lawyers and estate planners to help you get around the tax.
I agree with Luntz’s point. The tax only applies to people who are lousy planners. However, it doesn’t get over my irritation with mislabeling.
Years ago, I was trained in a field called estate planning. My job was to make rich people richer and I had a lot of clients.
If my title been “death planner” instead of “estate planner,” I don’t think I would have gotten as many customers.
The tax only applies to rich people, but Luntz and his ability to twist words had some poor and middle class people, who will never come close to paying an estate tax, railing against it.
“Words That Work” has practical tips, such as how to talk yourself into a better seat on an airplane or get more customers for a business.
I may not like some of the people that Luntz has helped, but I have to admire his craftsmanship.
He knows the ABCs of effective communication.
Don McNay of Richmond, an award-winning, syndicated financial columnist, author and Huffington Post Contributor, is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Round Table. Read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com.
Viewpoints
Words that work
- Viewpoints
-
-
Education a focus in Senate this week
FRANKFORT — The Senate passed several bills this week. Of these bills, three education bills are of particular importance.
-
Redistricting ruling offers collateral benefits for voters and taxpayers
Slowing down Frankfort’s redistricting march offers collateral benefits for voters and taxpayers.
-
In defense of southern-fried Paula Deen
Celebrity chef Paula Deen lustily massages salt into "a mighty fat hog,” as the dogs circle the cooking island. For the yams, “I’m only using half a stick of butter,” she drawls before breaking into high laughter. Deen’s popular Food Network show does southern cooking with no brakes on the pork fat, butter, sugar or other dietarily incorrect ingredients.
-
GOP makes Obama look good
The Republican field debated for the 19th time Thursday night, and once again, the media promised us it was going to be a “make or break” event.
Don’t believe the media. -
The real State of the Union
Has Barack Obama learned nothing in three years?
During his State of the Union address Tuesday night, he promised “a blueprint for an economy.”
But economies are crushed by blueprints. -
Looks ain’t everything
I guess we can blame it on television or the movies, that looks are so important in America, especially to young folks. These two mediums place such a premium on beautiful, shapely women and handsome men that most young people believe if you do not possess these attributes you are nothing.
-
It’s politics as usual
FRANKFORT – I’m betting that if you’ve followed the redistricting contortions birthed by the Democratic controlled House and Republican controlled Senate, you’re hardly shocked.
-
Cherry picking and charter schools
National School Choice Week is Jan. 22-28.
There’s little to celebrate in Kentucky – one of only nine states without a charter-school law. -
House knee-deep in important issues
Last week was filled with impassioned and sometimes heated discussions about redistricting as we struggled to meet the constitutional mandate to redraw boundary lines based upon U.S. census data.
-
Senate considers budgetary, drug issues
The second week of session saw several significant issues begin to be debated in committees. Drug abuse, weaknesses in child-protective services, and the state’s debt level were all topics of discussion. The committee process is intended to inform the legislators of the pros and cons of each bill. Lively debate accompanied each piece of legislation.
- More Viewpoints Headlines
-






