The other day, for oh … the thousandth time in my life, I waved back at a person who was waving at someone else.
It’s funny and always mildly embarrassing, even when you wave at someone you suspect in advance you don’t know. The embarrassment is really a wasted emotion given that the person you wave back to generally makes little of it. And for me it makes even less sense in light of the policy I adopted for myself: if someone waves, just wave back.
For more than 30 years, my father was the most well-known family physician in my hometown, a town that now mirrors Richmond in size, but was much smaller when I was growing up.
I couldn’t go anywhere with the man without someone saying “Hi Doc,” shaking his hand, and usually telling him how some malady they had seen him for was progressing.
The great majority of the time, when I asked who the person was, he told me, but occasionally he said, “I don’t know.” This was often after detailed, one sided conversations, in which my father mostly asked questions and listened.
On the rare occasions when he didn’t know who the person was, he never let on, and the unidentified patients never seemed wise to it. That is a learned skill.
On a brisk day in my practice, I deal with five to seven clients. My father saw many times that number of patients every day in his office. He also was the medical director at a local nursing home.
I asked my dad once why he didn’t ask people who they were. He explained that he learned early as a doctor, when he didn’t immediately recognize or remember a patient, it hurt their feelings. He also said that those conversations were not for him, they were for the patient, so he made sure it was a positive experience.
That is the approach I take to waving. As an attorney, I represent people at the some of the most stressful and notable moments in their lives. Consequently, they remember me. And the great majority of the time, I remember them. I don’t always remember their names or recognize their faces years later, but the thing I always seem to recall is the facts of their cases.
It is thought that people who don’t remember others are somehow flawed. It’s not that simple. I think you have to consider an individual’s circumstance. A doctor, a minister, an attorney, a shopkeeper, a judge or a teacher will all meet and affect many people during his or her lifetime. Try as we might, it is very difficult to recall everyone we interact with throughout the years.
One scenario that arises time and again is clients who swear to me that the judge knows them. Some clients believe it will somehow help — others that it will hurt.
I cannot tell you how often, after a case was over, when I asked the judge if he or she remembered my client, that the judge was clueless. Between the long dockets and the long campaigns they run to get to the bench, when it comes to remembering people, many judges have information overload.
I have coached youth football and baseball teams for years and judged mock-trial competitions. The kids don’t always remember me after years pass, but some parents do. When I run into people I can’t place, I have to ask myself: client? client’s family? coaching parent? other?
I haven’t obtained my father’s skill level yet. Sometimes people catch on that I didn’t immediately place them, and just remind me who they are, but usually I can remember with a little time and a few well placed innocuous questions.
Oddly, some of the people I recognize immediately say, “I can’t believe you remember me.” The fact is, I usually remember everyone, it’s just a matter of degree.
So when I walk down Main Street during a work day, as I very often do, given the number of people I’ve gotten to know and represented, some people honk and wave.
I used to look around and think, “me?” before waving back. I don’t do that anymore. Now, I throw up my hand, smile and wave, then try to figure out who it is. Because let’s face it, waves are free, and an errant wave never cost anyone (except maybe at an auction).
Viewpoints
The politics of a wave
- Viewpoints
-
-
Education a focus in Senate this week
FRANKFORT — The Senate passed several bills this week. Of these bills, three education bills are of particular importance.
-
Redistricting ruling offers collateral benefits for voters and taxpayers
Slowing down Frankfort’s redistricting march offers collateral benefits for voters and taxpayers.
-
In defense of southern-fried Paula Deen
Celebrity chef Paula Deen lustily massages salt into "a mighty fat hog,” as the dogs circle the cooking island. For the yams, “I’m only using half a stick of butter,” she drawls before breaking into high laughter. Deen’s popular Food Network show does southern cooking with no brakes on the pork fat, butter, sugar or other dietarily incorrect ingredients.
-
GOP makes Obama look good
The Republican field debated for the 19th time Thursday night, and once again, the media promised us it was going to be a “make or break” event.
Don’t believe the media. -
The real State of the Union
Has Barack Obama learned nothing in three years?
During his State of the Union address Tuesday night, he promised “a blueprint for an economy.”
But economies are crushed by blueprints. -
Looks ain’t everything
I guess we can blame it on television or the movies, that looks are so important in America, especially to young folks. These two mediums place such a premium on beautiful, shapely women and handsome men that most young people believe if you do not possess these attributes you are nothing.
-
It’s politics as usual
FRANKFORT – I’m betting that if you’ve followed the redistricting contortions birthed by the Democratic controlled House and Republican controlled Senate, you’re hardly shocked.
-
Cherry picking and charter schools
National School Choice Week is Jan. 22-28.
There’s little to celebrate in Kentucky – one of only nine states without a charter-school law. -
House knee-deep in important issues
Last week was filled with impassioned and sometimes heated discussions about redistricting as we struggled to meet the constitutional mandate to redraw boundary lines based upon U.S. census data.
-
Senate considers budgetary, drug issues
The second week of session saw several significant issues begin to be debated in committees. Drug abuse, weaknesses in child-protective services, and the state’s debt level were all topics of discussion. The committee process is intended to inform the legislators of the pros and cons of each bill. Lively debate accompanied each piece of legislation.
- More Viewpoints Headlines
-






