Viewpoints
Related Photos
-
Froma Harrop
Tools
What does the FHA think it is doing?
Exactly who made Bernadine Shimon think that she could buy a new house shortly after declaring bankruptcy and losing another home to foreclosure? The American taxpayer, that’s who.
Without a Federal Housing Administration willing to guarantee a $125,000-plus mortgage, this Denver-area schoolteacher’s recurring “dream of homeownership” could not come to pass. Shimon’s down payment was a tiny 3.5 percent.
This single mother is so strapped that she had to cash in her retirement savings to come up with the 3.5 percent. Her case was cited in a New York Times article about, not surprisingly, the sad shape the FHA finds itself in.
Of course, no sane private lender would take on such risk without a sucker-of-first resort, again the taxpayer. It happens like this: Private companies make their loans. The FHA buys the mortgages, and then rolls them into Ginnie Mae Mortgage Backed Securities. Sold around the world, these bonds are rock-solid investments because they carry an “explicit” taxpayer guarantee. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities came with only an “implicit” guarantee (though as we saw in the recent bailouts, those “implicit” guarantees are for all intents and purposes “explicit”).
Much of the blame for the housing bubble-then-bust goes to these government agencies: They let private lenders make mortgages without adult supervision, then guaranteed them. Such loans helped push the FHA’s capital reserve fund down toward (and possibly now under) its mandated 2-percent minimum. That means the suckers may soon be called upon in a big way. Edward Pinto, a former Fannie Mae executive, predicts that the taxpayers will be bailing out the FHA within the next two to three years.
The FHA was created in 1934 to help people of modest means buy homes. Fine, but shouldn’t they have more skin in the game than a 3.5 percent of the purchase price? A Republican proposal to raise the minimum down payment to 5 percent seems rather reasonable, especially when private lenders are insisting on 10 percent or even 20 percent.
Kenneth Donohue, inspector general of the Housing and Urban Development Department, seemed to be shaking his head. “What does the FHA think it is doing by asking only 3.5 percent?” he asked. (FHA is part of HUD.)
With nearly a quarter of FHA loans insured in the last two years now in trouble, you’d think that the agency would show more discretion in deciding which homebuyers to help. And you’d think that Democrats running the House Financial Services Committee would be more upset over the way the FHA still hands out taxpayer guarantees.
But committee Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts insists that these mortgages are needed to “keep prices from falling too fast.” Thing is, we can’t support real-estate values with shabby lending practices. That’s what got us into trouble.
Another good idea is to demand that banks take a hit for the first 10 percent of losses on the mortgages they originate. That would put their skin in the game. It would spur them to engage in responsible lending practices -- and not just collect a bunch of fees upfront, then unload the risk onto the taxpayers.
There was good news on the FHA front. The agency was ready to tighten rules for mortgages on condominiums. This would have curbed developers’ ability to fill their big empty buildings on the back of taxpayer guarantees. These new rules made real-estate interests unhappy, however, and now they are on hold.
We appreciate that the FHA had to step in and maintain the housing market’s pulse, but can’t it show better judgment? It’s not too much to ask that the FHA stop backing the loans of people fresh out of economic ruin.
To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
- Viewpoints
-
-
Budget debate about more than the budget
A few days before the 2010 General Assembly convened, Sen. Robert Stivers, R-Manchester, told a health care group the final version of a new state budget wouldn’t emerge until the last days of the session – just as it always does.
-
Bank merger benefits shareholders, not account holders
I have had my personal checking account at the same bank since I was in school. How I chose my bank was simple. My brother-in-law at the time was a branch manager and I opened an account with him. He left my bank and my family years ago, but I have stayed with my bank all these years for a simple reason: It was easy. Now my bank isn’t my bank anymore and it’s time for me to go, too.
-
Better than the can
If you are ever cut off from supermarkets and electricity due to a natural disaster (or because like some of us idiots you choose to go camping), you will be especially interested in this news.
-
Commissioners at fault for 2010 fiscal year deficit
If the Richmond City Commission would just take a look in a mirror, they will see who is responsible for a deficit of $1.8 million coming at the end of the 2010 fiscal year. They can’t make excuses or point fingers as they have up to now because this one rests solely on their shoulders. This large deficit simply is a result of their lack of action on expense-saving initiatives submitted last fall at the height of the financial crisis.
-
My Day at the Race Track Casino
I spent much of my childhood at race tracks. Usually not nice race tracks.
-
In like a lion, out like a lamb
The old saying goes that if March comes in like a lion, it will go out like a lamb or vice versa.
-
Americans can speak for themselves on health care
Have you voted on any of the Democratic health care reform plans? Me neither.
-
Things about money you don’t learn in college
College seniors are entering a world of money — and without very much preparation for what is about to hit them.
-
Hope’s Wings is a matter of life and death
Hope’s Wings suspended its residential housing service Friday after just one year of operation because of inadequate funding. During the past year, the center has provided shelter and safety to more than 200 women as they fight to be free from domestic violence. Robyn Moreland, executive director of Hope’s Wings, shared two stories with me that further illustrate the need and importance of funding the center because it is a matter of life and death.
-
Police disciplinary process
During the past few months, I’ve come to learn that many in the community do not understand the police disciplinary process and the requirements imposed on police departments and city governments by state law that directs the process.
- More Viewpoints Headlines
-
