FRANKFORT — A few days before the 2010 General Assembly convened, Sen. Robert Stivers, R-Manchester, told a health care group the final version of a new state budget wouldn’t emerge until the last days of the session – just as it always does.
I groaned, thinking of those final days of the session – the long nights, the endless wrangling, the frustration of watching the public’s most important business decided behind closed doors by a handful of powerful legislators. There are 138 members of the General Assembly and the governor on the first floor elected to set the state’s course. But in reality, 16 or so lawmakers make the most important decisions.
The Democrat-controlled House passes its version; the Republican controlled Senate re-works it to its liking and leaders from the two chambers hammer out the differences. Put that way, it doesn’t sound so bad. It evokes images of compromise to produce something they all can live with and for the state as a whole. But sometimes in those free conference committees entirely new items are added, things never debated by the larger chambers. Then the rank-and-file are asked to vote on the final product – often without time to read it much less analyze it.
It began differently this time. After Gov. Steve Beshear handed the budget off to the legislature, House Speaker Greg Stumbo and Senate President David Williams spoke frequently of the unusual level of cooperation and information sharing between the two chambers. Because they had to build an entire budget from scratch, they said, lawmakers couldn’t wait until the last hours of the session to fight over a small portion of a budget while both sides agreed to most of the rest in advance, especially with the state facing a $1.3 billion shortfall.
Now the House has passed a budget that tinkers with some business taxes and filled the budget with bonded projects – nearly all in Democratic districts – and avoids drastic cuts to popular areas of the budget. But the Senate doesn’t seem entirely pleased and likely won’t go along with major portions of the House budget. Stivers’ prediction appears on target – again.
It makes one wonder why lawmakers go through all the charades. Why not just pass a shell budget and proceed to the conference committee from the start? (According to a couple of lawmakers, such a suggestion was made but rejected early in the session.) Why?
Well, because this is an election year. It’s not just any election year. November’s legislative races will determine not only who will control the two chambers of the General Assembly, they will determine who draws legislative districts – both at the state and federal levels – after the 2010 census. Majorities skillfully draw them to protect their incumbents and endanger the other party’s.
So the House puts goodies in the budget for which its Democratic members can claim credit at election time – or blame Republicans for removing. Republicans in the Senate will craft a budget they can tout this fall. The intent was revealed during last week’s floor debate in the House. Republicans compared the Democratic plan to the Obama agenda and claimed retribution for Republicans’ earlier votes against the tax changes. They promised another form of retribution this fall at the polls. Democrats responded with accusations that the Bush administration caused the recession and made their own campaign-style speeches.
Now it’s the Senate’s turn. Enjoy the bombast and show. The real budget will emerge beginning in a couple of weeks.
Ronnie Ellis writes for CNHI News Service and is based in Frankfort. He may be reached at rellis@cnhi.com. Follow CNHI News Service stories on Twitter at www.twitter.com/cnhifrankfort.
The Richmond Register is a CNHI newspaper.
Viewpoints
Budget debate about more than the budget
- Viewpoints
-
-
Europe’s economic tremors offer useful lesson for Kentucky
Americans paying even cursory attention to what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic are about to get a stark reminder of an economic principle that too often gets pushed to the side – especially during troubling times: No government has ever taxed, spent or borrowed its way to prosperity.
-
Why would anyone not vote?
Should those of us who vote be disturbed that so few people voted in this past Tuesday’s election?
Only 17 percent of Madison County’s registered voters went to the polls. And, not everyone who’s eligible is registered to vote. -
Republicans are making some noise
FRANKFORT — Last week’s news was mostly about Tuesday’s primary election but some Republicans who were not on the ballot also had interesting things to say.
-
Taking our Sunday night baths
There in the head of Blair Branch, when I was growing up in the 1950s and ‘60s, we always took our weekly baths, even during cold weather, every Sunday night, whether we needed one or not.
-
Obama pursues higher tax rates
In the run-up to this weekend’s G-8 summit at Camp David, journalists have unfavorably compared European “austerity” with Barack Obama’s economic policies.
European spending cuts, the argument goes, have hurt people and are arousing political opposition, while Obama’s proposals to keep federal spending at 24 percent of gross domestic product indefinitely are likely to succeed. -
Graduation day
It’s that time of year. What’s the old song? “I can still remember...” And I do. It’s what I talk about when I’m invited to be a graduation speaker and what I write about every year at this time.
It’s about all those painful memories. -
Recent news could cause panic for Obama campaign
Is it panic time at Obama headquarters in Chicago? You might get that impression from watching events – and the polls – over the past few weeks.
-
EPA goes medieval on Kentucky coal
EPA goes medieval on KRoman legions? Horrific crucifixions? Sacking dissenters and making examples out of their deaths?
These may sound like some of the gruesome tactics used by military commanders of the ancient world, but according to Al Armendariz, who, until recently, was regional administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency, it’s much more relevant to modern America than we’d care to believe. -
Don’t just pick out a card
When Anna Jarvis launched the movement for a Mother’s Day observance in 1908, her intention was to have everyone write their mother a letter, putting some thought and sincerity into thanking and telling her what she had meant to them.
Unsurprisingly, the idea caught on quickly and became very popular. But, Jarvis was disappointed with the outcome. -
Returning to a calmer situation
FRANKFORT – After a two-month absence, I’ve returned to Frankfort where things seem calmer than when I left.
- More Viewpoints Headlines
-


