Making a bad bill worse

Opinion

Related Photos

C.L. Garvin

February 12, 2009

By John Stossel The Richmond Register Thu Feb 12, 2009, 10:09 AM EST

How do you make a dreadfully bad piece of legislation -- the nearly $900-billion so-called “stimulus” bill -- worse? Simple -- add protectionism.

The “Buy American” provision of the stimulus bill, which mandates the use of domestic iron, steel and manufactured goods even if imports are cheaper, makes our trading partners nervous. That created a problem for President Obama: “I think it would be a mistake ... at a time when worldwide trade is declining for us to start sending a message that somehow we’re just looking after ourselves and not concerned with world trade,” he said.

But some members of his party were elected on protectionist platforms, and they are not about to blow this chance to reward their union and industrial constituencies. What was Obama to do?

He did what old-style politicians always do: tried to have it both ways by resorting to vague rhetoric. He said he’d “see what kind of language we can work on this issue”

The Senate then added a line saying that the “Buy American” section must be “applied in a manner consistent with U.S. obligations under international agreements.”

So is the bill protectionist or not? It sounds as though our trade agreements must be respected, but as The New York Times noted, “[I]n many cases it [a “Buy American” provision] is not considered a violation of trade treaties.” Public Citizen’s protectionist website, Eyes on Trade, agrees: Under its trade agreements, the United States has “always been allowed to do most if not all of what is in the stimulus package.”

As long as it remains in the bill, the “Buy American” section will haunt us. Protectionism is poison. Prosperity means having access to the least expensive goods the world has to offer. When we save money buying something cheaper from abroad, we have more money to spend on other things or to invest. Laws that force us to pay more for things cannot make us wealthier.

Protectionist unions and firms say that a “Buy American” policy creates jobs at home. But that is misleading, because while protectionism does save some American jobs -- often temporarily -- the policy also destroys jobs at home.

It destroys jobs in two ways. First, when foreigners lose sales here, they have fewer dollars with which to buy American exports or to invest in the U.S. economy. Jobs in the export sector disappear, and the jobs that would have been created through the new investment won’t be created.

Second, when foreign nations retaliate against American exporters, even more jobs are destroyed.

“Buy American” is a dishonest slogan because it leads to a loss of American opportunities for prosperity. It is special-interest legislation that is paid for dearly by other Americans. As my first college economics professor, Burton G. Malkiel, wrote in The Wall Street Journal last week, “Beggar-thy-neighbor policies create more beggars and hostile neighbors.”

The alleged “stimulus” bill is a rotten idea to begin with. Government has no resources that it hasn’t first taken from someone else. By borrowing $800 billion to pay for pet political projects, government prevents that money from being used to rebuild the economy according to consumer preferences. Bad stimulus drives out good.

Protectionism makes it even worse, and we should know better. In 1929-30, President Herbert Hoover and the U.S. Congress helped turn a depression into the Great Depression by enacting the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariff. Hoover’s mere announcement that he would sign the bill pushed the stock market into the tank. Hoover and Congress then made their bad tariff decision worse by approving a “Buy America Act,” which required federal projects to use only American supplies. Hoover signed it on his last day in office. Countries the world over retaliated, and by 1932, U.S. exports had fallen 64 percent, aggravating unemployment, which approached 25 percent.

The effects of the “Buy American” provision of the “stimulus” bill may not be as egregious, but who knows?

What we do know is that many of our so-called leaders have learned nothing from history.

John Stossel is co-anchor of ABC News’ “20/20” and the author of “Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity.” To find out more about John Stossel and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Text Only

Opinion

Coffee makers and a gaggle of little girls
Our Keurig coffee maker has died and I am grieving big time.
Loretta has washed it out with two gallons of white vinegar — twice — and followed all the instructions that came with the book that tells about cleaning it and all that, but I knew, weeks ago, that cleaning it was like dressing a corpse.

February 3, 2012 1 Photo
Fretting over Christmas choices
Right around now is when people start fretting over creches in the public square and arguing as to whether publicly funded Christmas symbols violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment. And right about now is also when certain Jewish groups begin insisting that the answer is to place a Hanukkah menorah right next to that creche, which leads atheists to complain about a plague on both their houses.

December 21, 2011 1 Photo
Romney bets on old rules as Newt moves under radar
We’re not going to lose in New Hampshire.” So says Mitt Romney’s state coordinator, Jason McBride.
Stuart Stevens, the Romney campaign’s TV ad-maker, expresses similar confidence. Asked if Romney might finish second in New Hampshire, his answer is an unhesitating “no.”

December 16, 2011 1 Photo
Oma Mullins, 97
July 17, 2011
Food tampering laws overdue
In 2009, co-workers say a cook at a Kentucky State Park in Barren County put food down his pants before serving it to a retired Kentucky State Trooper he did not like. The cook was fired and a lawsuit was filed. It does not appear he was charged criminally.

June 19, 2011
Marilyn Monroe never sang to me The Republican governor of South Carolina probably should have a talk with former Kentucky Democrat governor Paul Patton.

Paul might be able to offer some tips on dealing with the extramarital affair recently disclosed after South Carolina’s chief executive vanished for over five days.
July 9, 2009 1 Photo
Making a bad bill worse How do you make a dreadfully bad piece of legislation -- the nearly $900-billion so-called “stimulus” bill -- worse? Simple -- add protectionism.
February 12, 2009 1 Photo
The national Ponzi scheme The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was set up to combat fraudulent practices. The SEC's website explains that "Ponzi schemes are a type of illegal pyramid scheme named for Charles Ponzi, who duped thousands of New England residents into investing in a postage stamp speculation scheme back in the 1920s.
February 11, 2009 1 Photo
It’s a dog’s life in Barker home Anybody who knows me that my promise to not write about my dog doesn’t hold any water.
February 10, 2009 1 Photo
Family planning is essential The right-wing attack machine went into overdrive last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dared to defend funds for family planning in the House’s stimulus bill.
February 9, 2009 1 Photo
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Related Photos

Making a bad bill worse

Have you ever attended a meeting of a local government agency or taxing district?

Site Map